How Nearly Wrecking Your Senior-Year Engineering Project Can Lead to Co-Founding a Tech Company

The moment when you need to act is exactly when the penalty for not acting becomes too much to bear. – Unknown

We’re tired of seeing the same mistakes happen to different people. It’s time for a change. 

Every year, hundreds of thousands of senior engineering students worldwide build something for their final year project. Under pressure from other coursework, they design and implement electronic systems with limited tools and experience — something many find unfamiliar and overwhelming. By the time they figure it out, order parts, and start assembling, mistakes happen. A power supply set to the wrong voltage or a shorted connection can send months of progress up in smoke.

That’s exactly what happened to me in my senior year. I remember sitting outside the lab, sick with anxiety, dreading how I’d tell my supervisor that my adjustable power supply had delivered 24 V instead of 12 V,  instantly destroying one of my smart servo motors

What bothered me most was what I found when I opened the device: no over-voltage protection whatsoever, despite the datasheet stating that default voltage limits were programmed in. That gave my team and me a false sense of security. Our main fuse never triggered because the fault was in the voltage itself, the resulting current spike was too brief to activate protection.

Smart Servo with one of its drive MOSFETs destroyed

Why are things done this way? It costs less than 40 cents and takes minimal space to add a simple part from Texas Instruments that would solve this problem. There are some minor technical complications (thermal management) from adding it, but nothing insurmountable. Instead, the designers chose to leave out these features because when an incorrect voltage is applied, the blame falls on the user – and that means more sales. These are predatory design tactics that exploit the lack of technical knowledge and best practices by new users, and end up discouraging those who are just starting out in electronics.

It was my mistake. I was the one who didn’t check before connecting it. But that doesn’t mean this is how things have to be.

After searching for overvoltage protection modules online, I was frustrated to find that all available options were either using under-performing parts, not rated my application, or using relay-based switching. To begin, these modules are slow to act, inefficient, and outdated. Given that our project cost about $6000 CAD to build (the majority of which was electronics), I was not going to let its success or failure hinge upon the performance of an $8 relay module from Amazon. As a result, I hacked together a primitive MOS transistor-based prototype on a breadboard. Although it was inefficient and scrappy, it nonetheless proved fast and accurate – and I ended up making it on a PCB before being integrated on the final robot. Shown below is a slide from our final presentation showing the initial prototype and final result:

Realizing that this new device had potential to protect people’s electronics and was filling a niche not covered by existing products, I set out to improve on my first prototype and see if it could have any commercial value.

It wasn’t easy. Many people were skeptical that it was even possible to build a small business around circuit protection/power management.

“Isn’t that one of the most basic things electrical engineering students learn on day one?” one of my friends asked.

“Let me know when your design sells for 50 cents on Temu,” joked someone else.

But I pushed ahead. After ten months of learning PCB design and refining the overall protection techniques, I finally had a fully analog design with 95% typical efficiency, offering overvoltage, undervoltage, reverse-polarity protection and a fuse for over-current.

Around the same time I was finishing this project, I reconnected with Ethan, an electrical engineer working in the consumer electronics industry. He mentioned that he wanted to start an electronics company. We teamed up, but when I showed him my design, he said it was solid but far too expensive to manufacture and sell sustainably. I had used a P-channel FET that gave good efficiency but accounted for 35% of my entire BOM cost!

So, I went back to the drawing board and redesigned the entire system around an ASIC that could do everything I needed – cheaply and reliably. After a few iterations, I had the Protect module – something that worked for over-voltage, reverse current and reverse polarity with up to 99% efficiency and a realistic production cost. Ethan, my now co-founder, made a YouTube video demonstrating the module, and it was seen by over 10 000 people.

The response was mixed. Some commenters didn’t understand why a fuse wasn’t enough. One person outright hated it, saying:
“Instead of using common sense, you made some stupid contraption to make yourself less diligent in your work!”

We didn’t care. We knew the value of what we were building — because we’re makers ourselves, and we use our own products in our designs. Our modules don’t just protect against overvoltage; we have made 3 Protect series modules now that also handle reverse current, reverse polarity, and overcurrent protection at a range of power levels. Using them effectively and making sure people know about them comes with some education and proper documentation. So that became our next focus.

To date, we have shipped over 120 modules to 10 different countries around the world to customers who work on building custom flight simulators, drones, cardiac imaging solutions, autonomous robotics and ocean-exploration technology, even though we’ve only just started.

We strive to fill existing niches with the kind of technology makers deserve, and we believe no one should suffer from outdated practices, bad design habits, or predatory engineering shortcuts – especially when better alternatives exist.

If that sounds like you, you’re one of us.

Here are some ways that you can help support our mission (without spending a dime):

  1. Follow us on our social media channels (Reddit, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok).
  2. Tell a friend.
  3. Tell us about a problem you’re facing that you think our products or services might be able to solve. (Please note: we don’t work on anything that normally operates above 60 V DC or 1.8 kW, and all relevant safety regulations still apply.)
Sean, Nick (Co-founder of PN Labs), Vignesh, Max showing off the final robot: an AI-powered hexapod for experimental gait training with reinforcement learning. (Capstone Team 5)
Share the Post:

Other Posts

Blog
Nick

How using a TP4056 Battery Charger can Ruin Your Project

TP4056-based modules are the cheapest single-cell lithium battery charger available on the market. Commonly sold in packs of 10 on Amazon, e-Bay, AliExpress and other online retailers, they are a classic buy for most DIY electronics hobbyists when first trying to work with a lithium-battery in their project. But they’re just that: chargers. In most cases, hobbyists drastically overestimate their utility and then end up in a potentially dangerous situation, and lithium batteries can easily catch fire if abused. At PN Labs, we have extensive experience working with lithium batteries and care about people using them correctly, so we’ve

Read More
Blog
Nick

Over-Current Protection Circuits that are Better than Fuses

Passive fuses are commonly implemented in electronic systems to melt during over-current conditions. This prevents excess energy from flowing into the system, however, they are often imprecise and insufficient for protecting real-world systems on their own.  This article explores why fuses are inherently limited, and explains several different circuit topologies that can be built or bought that offer more precise over-current protection. Note: Schematics presented here illustrate fundamental architectures and are not tailored towards any specific application. A technically qualified person should always test the final product to determine suitability for any safety-critical or high-stake applications. Why are fuses

Read More
Blog
Nick

Continuous Over-Voltage Protection Circuits

Continuous over-voltage is a common way circuits get destroyed because fuses and transient over-voltage protection devices like MOVs, TVS diodes and GDTs are not well suited to protect against them. In this article, we will discuss the pros and cons of different circuit topologies that are specifically for continuous over-voltage protection. Voltage Protection Topologies Over-voltage protection circuits can broadly be divided into two categories: transient and continuous. In this article, we will focus on methods for protecting against continuous overvoltage. Different topologies covered: SCR/TRIAC Crowbar Passive and Active Clamping Circuits Switched Disconnect (MOSFET or Relay) Voltage-Triggered Load-Dump Circuits SCR/TRIAC

Read More
Blog
Nick

Open-Source Protection Circuit Built Entirely from Analog ICs

The Active Power Protection Module (APPM) is an adjustable analog power protection module. It is designed for overvoltage, undervoltage, reverse polarity, and short circuit protection. No black box ASICs. Just comparators, FETs, fuses and voltage references.  The module is a culmination of nearly a year as an electronics student, working in my free time. This design was born after destroying a smart servo motor, by applying too high of a voltage.  For those who are looking for the finished product that is now sold by PN Labs, check out the Protect and Protect Nano. Description Specs Drawings Design explanation

Read More